Südafrika Forum

Zitat von »sunny_r«

7.000 ? Olympus vs 12.000? Nikon.
Beide damit aus meiner Sicht für die Profis.

Zitat

....... Earlier this year, just a few short months ago, I was exclusively a Canon shooter and I had a broad range from professional bodies, and L-series lenses. From wide angles all the way up to my much used and loved 500mm f4L IS.
I had carried that big lens all over the planet with me and made some of my very favourite images of wildlife with it.
But it was so big and heavy. So large, in fact, that for assignments and leading workshops in remote places, I’d stopped carrying it. It was just too big and cumbersome.
Instead, I started relying on smaller lenses, and eventually I invested in a compact Lumix mirrorless camera, which I viewed as a backup… until I started using it more than my big Canon DSLR.
For a week, I rented an Olympus 300mm f4 that I used on my Lumix body. After that week, I realised that the available equipment had moved past the need for the huge prime 500mm lens.

After a week of making images like this with the Olympus 300mm f4, I knew I was ready to sell my Canon 500mm f4.
So, I made the tough decision to sell off all my Canon gear, including the beautiful white 500mm f4. I opted to purchase a Lumix G9 camera, and an Olympus 300mm f4 PRO lens.
At $2,500 for the lens it was a quarter of the price of a new Canon 500mm f4, and the quality, quite frankly, is extraordinary.
There is a misconception in digital photography that the only “professional” cameras have full-frame sensors. I’m here to tell you that’s utter nonsense.
Other sensor sizes like APS-C and particularly m4/3rds are not worse, just different....
.....The smaller sensors of Olympus and Lumix cameras mean that you gain a 2x crop factor relative to full-frame, and lenses can be produced smaller and lighter while retaining the same maximum aperture as the big glass.
This means that my 300mm f4 lens is comparable to a 600mm f4 in a full-frame, but at a third the size and weight. That’s a formula I like.
Anyway, my point is: don’t blow off the 4/3rd system. Here are three great options for telephoto lenses for these cameras:
Lumix 100-400 – Offering an equivalent range of a whopping 200-800mm, and priced about $1,600, this little lens (and it is small), is a great option for the 4/3rd system, though it lacks the sharpness and smaller max aperture of the two below.

....Lumix 200 F2.8 – At $2,500, this lens comes equipped with a 1.4x teleconverter making it a 280mm f4 (560mm f4 equivalent). Sharp, compact, light and with a clean bokeh, this is a great lens.
Olympus 300mm f4 – Also priced about $2,500, this telephoto is my current wildlife lens. It’s sharp with a clean bokeh and much lighter and more compact that a comparable prime for a full-frame camera.
Advantages: Smaller and more compact with a magnification and bokeh (almost) equivalent to the prime 500 and 600mm f4s made by Canon and Nikon. Also much more reasonably priced.
.........

(Der Link ist für Gäste ausgeblendet. Um ihn zu sehen, bitte registrieren!)

Aber selbst die Verbesserungen bei den JPEG`s sind phänomenal.

(Der Link ist für Gäste ausgeblendet. Um ihn zu sehen, bitte registrieren!)

@Silke: weißt du, ob man die Software mit einer Lizenz an 2 Rechnern gleichzeitig nutzen kann?

(Der Link ist für Gäste ausgeblendet. Um ihn zu sehen, bitte registrieren!)

@Silke - habe mal ein paar RAW-Aufnahmen gemacht und in DxO bearbeitet. Kann da aber bei HD zu Deep Prime keinen Unterschied erkennen.